Hire before you fire…think again!
Recently we were asked to conduct a secret search for a position that was currently occupied by an incumbent who had no idea he was about to be replaced. We declined.
Dealing with a hire before you fire situation is very touchy. My advice is to be extremely wary of using such an approach and to restrict its use to only the most extraordinary circumstances.
The simple truth is that a “hire before you fire” approach hurts companies more than it helps. Not only does it send a poor message to candidates, it sends a horrible message to current employees.
Your conduct is symbolic of who you are
How a company conducts a search for new employees creates a snapshot of the kind of company it is. Is it an open, honest, ethical environment? Is it a company people can respect? These questions are answered in part by the way you conduct your search.
The real question you need to ask is what kind of company are we? And what kind of company do we want to be? This should guide your actions. Even though a crucial employee may decide to leave prematurely if they learn they are going to be replaced, it’s the honorable thing to share this information. Of course, making contingency plans in case that employee does bolt prematurely is part of what good companies do. But attempting to actively go on the open market and fill the position in advance is another thing altogether.
Searches cloaked in secrecy create unintended consequences
Companies that engage in hire before you fire searches are usually oblivious of the unintended consequences. Secret searches are often difficult. Primarily because confidentiality is paramount. Often recruiters may not divulge essential information to candidates such as the company name, location, or other crucial details.
Mediocre or desperate candidates might accept this level of secrecy, but great talent definitely does not. “Come back to me when you can divulge all pertinent information,” one typically hears from talented professionals. And to their credit - it’s the answer I want to hear from them. Why? Because if they’re too interested in a position shrouded in secrecy, it makes me question if they’re really that good. Additionally, if they learn that an incumbent is unaware of the search and they see nothing wrong with it, it makes me wonder what kind of ethics and values they would bring to the company. Let’s face it, if a company is doing something sneaky, I have to assume willing candidates are quite willing to be just as sneaky.
One thing companies must understand is that every word, every behavior, every action, is evidence to potential candidates of the kind of organization they are dealing with. Everything communicates.
Our practice has turned away several hire before you fire assignments. What we have been willing to do in certain cases, is to prepare the search, conduct necessary research, identify the people we would want to approach, etc, so that we can jump into the search, full-speed, as soon as the incumbent has been informed of the company’s decision to replace them. Only then will we typically contact anyone about this search. Taking this approach frees us from maintaining secrecy and allows us to perform the best search possible, while reducing the lead time for bringing in candidates.
Search is more than just finding an executive
Of course the primary goal of any search is to find a suitable placement, but how you conduct a search is a a public display of the kind of organization it is. Don’t believe that simply because a search firm is running the search that your company won’t take a hit. The search firm you select and the way they run the search is equally telling as the interactions a candidate experiences with your company. After all, you hired this search firm, so the expectation is that you endorse their work and stand by how they represent you.
What’s more, engaging in a hire before you fire search is extremely damaging to your employees. It creates uncertainty and distrust. Don’t be surprised if a number of your employees start wondering if they might not be next.
But if all these factors don’t dissuade you from pursuing this approach, consider that such searches are often flawed, resulting in candidates who are not the strongest. Typically they are only incrementally better if that. And what kind of victory is that?
So think again and realize the upside to tackling the situation with integrity. Doing so will result in better results and a better reputation.
